|

|
Phytoremediation
Overview: Phytoremediation
is the use of certain plants to clean up soil, sediment, and water contaminated
with metals and/or organic contaminants such as crude oil, solvents, and
polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). It is a name for the expansion of an
old process that occurs naturally in ecosystems as both inorganic and
organic constituents cycle through plants. Plant physiology, agronomy,
microbiology, hydrogeology, and engineering are combined to select the
proper plant and conditions for a specific site. Phytoremediation is an
aesthetically pleasing mechanism that can reduce remedial costs, restore
habitat, and clean up contamination in place rather than entombing it
in place or transporting the problem to another site.
Phytoremediation can be used to clean up contamination in several ways:
-
Phytovolatilization: Plants take up water and organic contaminants
through the roots, transport them to the leaves, and release the contaminants
as a reduced of detoxified vapor into the atmosphere.
-
Microorganism stimulation: Plants excrete and provide enzymes
and organic substances from their roots that stimulate growth of microorganisms
such as fungi and bacteria. The microorganisms in the root zone then
metabolize the organic contaminants.
-
Phytostabilization: Plants prevent contaminants from migrating
by reducing runoff, surface erosion, and ground-water flow rates.
"Hydraulic pumping" can occur when tree roots reach ground water,
take up large amounts of water, control the hydraulic gradient, and
prevent lateral migration of contaminants within a ground water zone.
-
Phytoaccumulation/extraction: Plant roots can remove metals
from contaminated sites and transport them to leaves and stems for
harvesting and disposal or metal recovery through smelting processes.
-
Phytodegradation by plants: Organic contaminants are absorbed
inside the plant and metabolized (broken down) to non-toxic molecules
by natural chemical processes within the plant.
The
following list gives the media, contaminants and typical plants for the
types of phytoremediation listed above.
|
Application
|
Media
|
Contaminants
|
Typical Plants
|
| 1.Phytovolatization |
Soil, groundwater, Landfill leachate, land application
of wastewater |
Herbicides (atrazine, alachlor); Aromatics (BTEX); Chlorinated
aliphatics(TCE); Nutrients; Ammunition wastes(TNT,RDX) |
Phreatophyte trees(poplar,willow, cottonwood,aspen);
Grasses(rye, Bermuda, sorghum, fescue); Legumes (clover, alfalfa,
cowpeas) |
| 2.Microorganism stimulation |
Soil, sediments, Land application of waste water |
Organic contaminants(pesticides aromatic, and polynuclear
aromatic hydrocarbons |
Phenolics releasers(mulberry, apple,osage orange); Grasses
with fribous roots(rye,fescue,bermuda); Aquatic plants for sediments |
| 3.Phytostabilization |
Soil, sediments |
Metals(Pb,Cd,Zn,As,Cu,Cr,Se,U), Hydrophobic Organics(PAH,PCB,DDT,dieldrin) |
Phreatophyte trees to transpire large amounts of water(hydraulic
control); Grasses to stabalize soil erosion; Dense root systems are
needed to sorb/bind contaminants |
| 4.Phytoaccumulation/extraction |
Soil, Brownfields, sediments |
Metals(Pb,Cd,Zn,As,Cu,Cr,Se,U) with EDTA addition for
Pb Selenium |
Sunflowers; Indian Mustard; Rape seed plants; Barle,
Hops; Crucifers; Serpentine plants; Nettles, dandelions |
| 5.Degradation |
Soil, groundwater, Landfill leachate, land application
of wastewater |
Herbicides (atrazine, alachlor); Aromatics (BTEX); Chlorinated
aliphatics(TCE); Nutrients; Ammunition wastes(TNT,RDX) |
Phreatophyte trees(poplar,willow, cottonwood,aspen);
Grasses(rye, Bermuda, sorghum, fescue); Legumes (clover, alfalfa,
cowpeas) |
Advantages
and Disadvantages of Phytoremediation
When using phytoremediation there are many positive and negative aspects
to consider. The advantages and disadvantages are listed below.
|
Advantages
|
Disadvantages
|
| Works on a variety on organic and inorganic compounds |
May take several years to remediate |
| Can be either In Situ/ Ex Situ |
May depend on climatic conditions |
Easy to implement and maintain |
Restricted to sites with shallow contamination within
rooting zone |
| Low-cost compared to other treatment methods |
Harvested biomass from phytoextraction may be classified
as a RCRA hazardous waste |
| Environmentally Friendly and aesthetically pleasing to the public |
Consumption of contaminated plant tissue is also a
concern.
|
| Reduces the amount wastes to be landfilled |
Possible effect on the food chain |
A major advantage that is listed above is the low cost. For example, the
cost of cleaning up one acre of sandy loam soil at a depth of 50cm with
plants is estimated at $60,000-$100,000 compared to $400,000 for the conventional
excavation and disposal method. One reason for this low cost is phytoremediation
may not require expensive equipment or highly specialized personnel, and
can be relatively easy to implement.
One major concern with phytoremediation is the possible affects on the
food chain. For example vegetation is used that absorbs toxic or heavy
metals and moles or voles eat the metal contaminated plants. The predators
of the moles or voles then become victims of intoxication. All though
the possibilities of such scenarios are being looked at, more fieldwork
and analysis is necessary to understand the possible effects phytoremediation
can have.
Regulatory
issues
As of now phytoremediation is too new to be approved by regulatory agencies
such as the EPA. Eventually the main question that regulators will focus
on is will phytoremediation remediate the site to the standards and reduce
the risk to human health and the environment. In developing regulations
for phytoremediation the following questions will need answering.
-
Can it cleanup the site below action levels? On what scale?
-
Does it create any toxic intermediate or products?
-
Is it cost effective as alternative methods?
-
Does the public accept the technology?
Contacts
This fact sheet was written 2001 by Todd
Zynda, Michigan State University TAB Program.
The Technical assistance for Brownfield Communities (TAB) Program
provides independent technical expertise to communities with contaminated
sites and promotes community involvement in site-cleanup projects. For
more information about TAB, please contact Lisa Szymecko, TAB Coordinator,
at (800) 490-3890.
EnviroTools.org is created at Michigan State University and is sponsored by
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. If you have comments
or questions, please contact us.
|
|



|